Principles for Title IX Grievance Procedure
- Respondents shall be presumed not responsible for the alleged conduct unless or until a determination of responsibility is reached after completion of the grievance and disciplinary processes.
- Before imposing discipline, the college is responsible for gathering and presenting evidence to a neutral and unbiased decision maker establishing responsibility for a Title IX violation by a preponderance of the evidence.
- The college shall treat both the Complainant and Respondent equitably by providing Complainant with remedies against Respondent who has been found responsible for Sexual Harassment through application of the institution’s Title IX grievance and applicable Title IX disciplinary procedures and by providing Respondent with Title IX procedural safeguards contained in this Title IX Grievance Procedures and in the applicable Title IX disciplinary procedures.
- The investigator shall base investigation results on all relevant evidence, including both exculpatory and inculpatory evidence.
- Formal and informal resolutions will be pursued within reasonably prompt timeframes with allowances for temporary delays and extensions for good cause shown. Grounds for temporary delay include, but are not limited to Winter, Spring and Summer breaks and other scheduled breaks in the school schedule. Good cause supporting a request for an extension includes, but is not limited to: a party, a party’s advisor, or a witness being unavailable, concurrent law enforcement activity, and the need for language assistance or accommodation of disabilities. Both parties will receive written notice of any temporary delay or extension for good cause with an explanation of why the action was necessary.
- A Respondent found responsible for engaging in Sexual Harassment may receive discipline
up to and including dismissal from the college.
An employee found responsible for Sexual Harassment may receive discipline up to and including dismissal from employment. In proceedings against a student Respondent, the parties may appeal the Student Conduct Committee’s ruling to the President pursuant to WAC 132Y-125-020 and Supplement Title IX Student Conduct Code Procedures, WAC 132Y-125-115. - In proceedings against an employee Respondent, the parties may appeal the Employee Disciplinary Decision to the President or designee.
- Title IX Administrators may not require, allow, rely upon, or otherwise use questions
or evidence that seeks disclosure of privileged communications, unless the privilege
has been effectively waived by the holder. This provision applies, but is not limited
to information subject to the following:
- Spousal/domestic partner privilege;
- Attorney-Client and attorney work product privileges;
- Privileges applicable to members of the clergy and priests;
- Privileges applicable to medical providers, mental health therapists, and counsellors;
- Privileges applicable to sexual assault and domestic violence advocates; and
- Other legal privileges identified in RCW 5.60.060